A lawyer, representing some of those who survived the fire as well as the loved ones of some who lost their lives, stated there had been a "prolonged period of concealment by Government which should properly be regarded as one of the major scandals of our time".

Module six of the inquiry's second phase is looking at the regime for the testing, certification and classification of materials for use in external cladding systems, as well as examining the role of central Government in establishing the legislative regime and formulating guidance on how to comply with it.

Counsel to the inquiry, Richard Millett QC, listed the essential question to be:

• Whether the risks from fire in high rise buildings were properly understood by Government before the Grenfell blaze
• Whether lessons had been learned from previous relevant incidents in the UK and overseas
• Which steps had or had not been taken by Government to address the risks from fire in high rise buildings
• What motivated Government in its approach to fire safety before the 2017 disaster

Phase two of the inquiry is examining how Grenfell Tower came to be coated in flammable materials which contributed to the spread of flames, which shot up the tower in June that year, killing 72 people.

Stephanie Barwise QC, representing some of the bereaved, survivors and residents, told the inquiry: "The Grenfell disaster is a predictable, yet unintended, consequence of the combination of the laudable desire to reduce carbon emissions, coupled with an unbridled passion for deregulation, in particular a desire to deregulate and boost the housing construction industry.

"Government's response, on realising the extent of the problem, was to react by concealment, instead of candour.

Ahead of Monday's hearing Grenfell United said the "the spotlight will finally fall on the Government" in this part of the inquiry.

In a statement, the group for bereaved and survivors said: "Government's indifference to safety has been going on for decades and, had it not been for the loss of our families in the most public way, people would still be oblivious to how deadly their homes really are.

They added: "This ugly reality is more evident than ever, so we need to know how far the rot goes - as no-one should be exempt from real accountability."

Source